By: Nic Chrysochou
The competitor stands
at the starting line. Eyes focused, adrenaline pumping through his body
increasing his heart rate; shaking his hands as if they contained dice as a
gambler would do at a craps table; flicking his feet forwards as if kicking an
imaginary football; licking his lips in anticipation...
My preparation for the double header weekend began shortly
after the Gatecrash release. I had decided to attempt to relax and enjoy
playing Magic the Gathering (MtG) as a hobby again after a series of very
unexpected and disappointing results.
I had competed in all the following available qualifier
events over the past year after the World Magic Cup 2012 (WMC):
·
South African Invitational in Johannesburg
·
PTQ Gatecrash (Montreal) in Cape Town
·
PTQ Dragon’s Maze (San Diego) in Johannesburg
The lead up to all these events were done in a similar
manner and I was confident that the process and procedures I followed would
bring success.
During the weeks before the double header weekend I was
asked by one of South Africa’s top players a question regarding changing decks
or keeping one deck through-out the season. This was my response (can be found
on SA
gatherer blog):
"Due to the progressive nature of competitive Magic, ideas and
strategies change on a weekly basis making it grueling to keep up with the
meta-game.
From personal experience I feel that playing different decks over the course
of a season would be more beneficial to the player in that one can learn all
the tricks and play styles of the decks in order to understand all the various
archetypes. But this requires a serious time investment and constant contact
with the professional game.
Therefore sticking to one deck and tweaking it over the course of the
season could allow for more consistent results as long as that archetype
remains competitive."
I believe that my response very accurately describes how I
feel about the question and reflects the preparation for events that I take
part in.
The following is a table of results of the various decks
that I used in my testing gauntlet for the double header weekend over an
approximately 5 week period:
Deck
|
Result
|
Losses to
|
Jund Control
|
7-2-0
|
B/W Zombies
G/B Zombies
|
Aristocrats
|
3-2-0
|
Esper Control
Boros Aggro
|
Junk Reanimator
|
3-2-0
|
Jund Aggro
Boros Aggro
|
Bant Hexproof
|
5-3-0
|
Boros Aggro
Jund Control
Junk Reanimator
|
Esper Control
|
2-2-0
|
B/W Token Humans
4-Color Reanimator
|
U/G Delver
|
3-2-0
|
Junk Reanimator
Junk Midrange
|
Borzhov Control
|
14-3-0
|
2x U/B Zombies
Naya Blitz
|
American Hexproof
|
2-3-0
|
B/R Control
Junk Reanimator
Jund Control
|
*NOTE, the
above are only local DCI sanctioned events, no MTGO or play-test results
included
As you can see I decided to play a variety of decks and
archetypes, not only to attempt to learn all the various strategies but also to
get back the enjoyment of competing and constructing new ideas and interesting
combinations of cards.
Approximately 2 weeks before the double header weekend, I
narrowed down my deck choices to what I was having the most consistent results
with. My two final choices were Jund and Borzhov control. As with all my
previous events I usually choose a deck that is unexpected or not as popular or
in the public spotlight. Therefore this is the deck-list I registered (can be
found online here):
Borzhov
Control
|
|
Non-Creature
spells
2x Tragic Slip
2x Dreadbore
Creature
spells
Lands
1x Mountain
1x Swamp
4x Blood Crypt
|
Sideboard
1x Staff of Nin
|
60 cards
|
15 cards
|
The above deck-list went through many iterations before
coming to the final version. I initially added cards like Falkenrath Aristocrat, Searing
Spear, Assemble the Legion and
some others in an attempt to make it more aggressive but realised that the deck
wanted to play a more controlling defensive game, before landing a bomb to
close out the match (or combo’ing off with Boros
Reckoner + Blasphemous Act).
Side-boarding
Archetype
|
In (combination of)
|
Out (combination of)
|
Aggro (or Aristocrats)
|
2x Pillar of Flame
2x Sever the bloodline
1/2x Curse of Death’s Hold
|
1x Rakdos’s Return
1x Faithless looting
2x Liliana of the Veil
1x Aurelia, the Warleader
|
Control (or Jund)
|
2x Slaughter Games
2/3x Appetite for brains
2x Rakdos’s Return
1x Staff of Nin
|
1/2x Olivia Voldaren
2x Mizzium Mortars
2x Tragic Slip
1/2x Blasphemous Act
|
Re-animator
|
1x Purify the Grave
3x Appetite for Brains
2x Slaughter Games
|
2x Mizzium Mortars/Tragic Slip
2x Dreadbore
2x Liliana of the Veil
|
* NOTE, the
above is just a typical side-boarding guide but is still dependent on what
exactly my opponent is playing, and may change on what I see during the games.
The card choices may seem strange but I attempted to build
the deck in order to “curve-out” every turn to maximise efficiency. The only
card choice that I wasn’t 100% happy with is the 2x Vault of the Archangel. I feel that most games I didn’t really need
the card and the deck wanted coloured land esp. with Boros Reckoner, more often. Therefore I would replace one Vault of the Archangel with another Sacred Foundry.
There are also not many additions post Dragon’s Maze that can be made to this deck, but here are a few
possible cards that could improve some matchups:
·
Sire of Insanity
·
Entering (breaking//entering)
·
Master of Cruelties
·
Blood Baron of Vizkopa
·
Toil//Trouble
·
On colour keyrunes or cluestones
The starting signal is
called. The competitor moves towards the starting blocks and locks himself into
position. All peripheral noise and excitement is filtered out. A moment of
absolute silence.
On your marks;
Get set;
Go.
Saturday’s Pro tour Qualifier (PTQ) did not start of well
for me as I faced the fearfully fast (but sometimes inconsistent) Naya Blitz in
Round 1. The first round seemed to set the tone of the day for me as I had a
very challenging time in deciding to keep seven or even six cards in hand. This
really tested me and I wasn’t able to get the upper hand throughout the day.
Here are my results for the PTQ (I ended on 4-3-0):
Round
|
Opponent
|
Opponent’s Deck
|
Result
|
1
|
Neil de la Rey
|
Naya Blitz
|
Loss 0-2
|
2
|
Eugene Klopper
|
BUG Zombies
|
Win 2-1
|
3
|
Francois Smuts
|
Esper Control
|
Win 2-0
|
4
|
Christopher Cleghorn
|
Jund Control
|
Loss 1-2
|
5
|
Christian Posthumus
|
Naya Blitz
|
Win 2-1
|
6
|
Harris Fong
|
BUG Zombies
|
Win 2-1
|
7
|
Calvin Baron
|
Jund Control
|
Loss 0-2
|
After feeling a little dejected and bemoaning that the
situation just failed to work out for me, after the extensive effort put into
the event, I adjusted my attitude for Sunday and decided to just play it out
and let events unfold.
Here are my results for the WMCQ (I ended 6-1-0 at the end
of the swiss rounds):
Round
|
Opponent
|
Opponent’s Deck
|
Result
|
1
|
Lee Jardine
|
Jund Control
|
Win 2-1
|
2
|
Clinton Smit
|
Jund Control
|
Loss 0-2
|
3
|
Navare Wilson
|
Mono Black Control
|
Win 2-1
|
4
|
JayJay van Vuuren
|
B/W Zombies
|
Win 2-0
|
5
|
Devin Dilworth
|
Grixis Zombies
|
Win 2-0
|
6
|
Kyle Singh
|
Naya Blitz
|
Win 2-0
|
7
|
Jarcque Henning
|
Bant Control
|
Win 2-0
|
Quarter’s
|
Mark Oppenheimer
|
R/G Aggro
|
Win 2-1
|
Semi’s
|
John Wood
|
Aristocrats
|
Win 2-1
|
Final’s
|
Andrew Wright
|
Huminator
|
Loss 0-2
|
I really played against some admirable and gracious
opponents and I’m certain that if that is the attitude of most of the South African
magic players, we are headed for greatness. I definitely learned that every win
(and loss) begins and ends with me and only I can be responsible for it. Thanks
again to all my team-mates and people who were supporting me on Sunday. Also
thanks to the event organisers and judges for their professionalism and
administration during the weekend.
The competitor shoots
off the blocks as the gun fires. Charging like a raging bull towards the
hurdles. First hurdle, clear; second, clear; third, clear. Floating fully
extended over the remaining hurdles like a race horse over a hedge. Final
hurdle;
Trailing Ankle;
Clang;
Stumble;
Plunge;
Pain;
Agony;
Failure...
Get up;
Acceptance;
Grit teeth;
Cross finish line;
Fire in eyes still
glowing;
Train harder for next
event...
No comments:
Post a Comment